|Date||Title / Description||Documents|
February 24, 2015
Public comment on the IOSCO Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation Consultation Report
ISDA appreciates the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation’s engagement with the industry throughout this consultation process. ISDA has previously submitted comments to the Task Force on a number of specific issues, and highlighted how OTC derivatives markets have been affected by a lack of effective cross-border regulatory harmonization. OTC derivatives markets have historically been the most global in nature of all financial markets, and the absence of consistency in regulatory reform is having a direct impact on these markets as a result. We appreciate the efforts of the Task Force, in this latest Consultation Report, to identify tools at a regulator’s disposal to address cross border regulation. In this letter, ISDA reiterates how cross-border regulatory harmonization could be achieved, and suggests ways in which IOSCO can reduce undesirable regulatory outcomes that threaten the efficient functioning of markets.
May 29, 2014
IOSCO Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation invitation for industry submissions
ISDA appreciates the IOSCO Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation’s engagement with the industry at meetings in Hong Kong on April 7, London on April 25 and Washington, DC on April 28, 2014. Further to discussions during those meetings, ISDA wishes to comment on a number of specific issues, and highlight how OTC derivatives markets have been affected by a lack of effective cross-border regulatory harmonization. OTC derivatives markets have historically been the most global in nature of all financial markets, and the absence of consistency in regulatory reform is having a direct impact on these markets as a result. This also affects other product areas and, more importantly, threatens the efficiency with which ‘real economy’ end-users can manage and transfer business risk to financial markets.
March 7, 2014
Request for Comment on Application of Commission Regulations to Swaps Between Non-U.S. Swap Dealers and Non-U.S. Counterparties Involving Personnel or Agents of the Non-U.S. Swap Dealers Located in the United States
ISDA Letter to CFTC.
February 10, 2014
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – Position Limits for Derivatives (RIN 3038-AD99)
ISDA/SIFMA Comment Letter to CFTC.
February 4, 2014
Reference Materials - ISDA Protocol and EU/US Comparison
October 11, 2013
Dodd-Frank March 2013 Protocol (DFP2) to EMIR Top Up Agreement
**ISDA has updated the DFP2 to EMIR Top Up Agreement as of 11th October 2013 to correct some minor typographical errors. The updated version and blackline are posted here**. On September 10, ISDA published the DFP2 to EMIR Top Up Agreement. This document seeks to allow for EMIR-compliant documentation for parties that have adhered to the Dodd-Frank March Protocol (“DFP2”) and do not wish to adhere to the ISDA 2013 EMIR Portfolio Reconciliation, Dispute Resolution and Disclosure Protocol (“EMIR Protocol”) in addition to this. The explanatory memo is provided to assist in your consideration of the DFP2 to EMIR Top Up Agreement. This document is designed to facilitate compliance with EMIR and Dodd Frank - this document extends DFP2 to cover EMIR compliance “add-ons”.
October 9, 2013
CDS on US Sovereign Debt - FAQ
Responses to some frequently-asked questions that ISDA has received in connection with a potential CDS Credit Event on US sovereign debt. This does not constitute legal advice, and is subject in all respects to any determination that the ISDA Americas Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee may make in relation to CDS referencing the United States. ISDA makes no comment on the likelihood of the events described in this FAQ.
August 20, 2013
Methodology for Regulatory Comparisons (Substituted Compliance)
This paper sets forth ISDA’s views regarding a conceptual framework and substantive processes for inter-jurisdictional recognition of derivatives regulation through a principles-based substituted compliance methodology. Our framework prioritizes achievement of the G-20 goals for OTC derivatives.
August 20, 2013
Common Principles - Examples (Substituted Compliance)
In our “Methodology for Regulatory Comparisons” document, ISDA proposed concepts to guide the comparisons of derivatives regulations that will be carried out by regulators assessing the possibility of substituted compliance. Our methodology relies on regulators, with input from the markets, developing common principles that will apply in various subject matter areas within derivatives regulation. These principles should be cast to support comparability of regulation without requiring identical regulation. To illustrate our proposed methodology, we offer the following examples of common principles. These examples have been developed and organized in relation to several of the original G-20 derivatives goals. (To be clear, these are merely examples and do not purport to illustrate comprehensive treatment of their subject matter areas.)
June 7, 2013
Letter to CFTC on CME Amended Request to Adopt New Chapter 10 and New Rule 1001
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. Amended Request to Adopt New Chapter 10 and New Rule 1001 (IF 12-014). Letter to Commodity Futures Trading Commission.